View the profiles of professionals named Jaco Gericke on LinkedIn. There are 5 professionals named Jaco Gericke, who use LinkedIn to exchange information. View Jaco Gericke’s profile on LinkedIn, the world’s largest professional community. Jaco has 1 job listed on their profile. See the complete profile on LinkedIn. Jaco Gericke is associate research Professor in the Department of Theology and Philosophy in the Faculty of Humanities at the North-West University’s Vaal.
|Published (Last):||8 August 2015|
|PDF File Size:||15.15 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||13.71 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Similar authors to follow
Some recent affirmative perspectives more. What has been called ” the pneumatology ” of the Hebrew Bible is generally held to be an unsolved problem. Towards a philosophical theology of the Old Testament more. This book will feature a collection of published and reworked essays on Qohelet in religion to metaphysics, axiology, epistemology, meta-ethics, comparative philosophy of religion, the history of philosophical exegesis of the book, the deconstruction of solar mythology in the text, etc.
Jaco Gericke | North-West University –
However, the mainstream research on these matters tends to focus on the philosophical foundations of or backgrounds to a particular literary theory, rather than on metaphysical puzzles as encountered in the philosophy of fiction proper.
So just as the Old Testament is not a textbook of theology and contain more than gerkcke theological perspective on related things, so it is not one of philosophical theology, even though the issues discussed in the latter discipline can be redescribed with reference to what, if anything, Old Testament texts themselves can be said to presuppose as similarly problematic.
The quest for a philosophical YHWH part 3: Resources for Biblical Study Apr 09, New articles related to this author’s research.
What, according to the Hebrew Bible, was a god assumed to be?
Descriptive currents in philosophy of religion for Hebrew Bible Studies more. High to Low Avg. To fill this gap, the present article seeks to provide a meta-theoretical overview of the main contemporary philosophical perspectives on the metaphysics of fictional objects.
The aim is not to justify or criticize the associated biblical contents but to reconstruct the philosophical-type reflection that selected texts featuring these concepts can be shown to presuppose for them in order to have taken the form they did.
Popularity Popularity Featured Price: In the apocryphal text of the Letter Maco of Jeremiah Ep Jera long list of reasons is given by the implied author as to why certain entities alleged to be gods are not in fact such. To this day, available research operates on the assumption of a ” missing link ” between theological, cosmological, and In Hebrew Bible scholarship, a variety of philosophical issues surrounding fiction have received sustained and in-depth attention.
You can find out more about this program unit and research in this field at our blog. My earlier work between was concerned with a program of extensive atheological critique of biblical truth claims following a loss gericie faith in and a militant atheist phase.
What is a God?
Realism and non-realism in Old Testament theology more. What is your god? What is a God? A comprehensive philosophical approach to Qohelet’s epistemology more. New articles by this author. It is argued that any attempt to describe tericke actual metaphysical nature and ontological status of the religious object in the jargon of a particular interpretative approach is forever prone to committing the fallacy of reductionism.
The concept of J Gericke Journal for Semitics 22 2, Philosophical criticism as a form of biblical criticism. This “Cited by” count includes citations to the following articles in Scholar. A comprehensive typology of philosophical perspectives on Qohelet more. Atheism in Old Testament scholarship more. The approach adopted by the study is philosophical in general and descriptively metaphysical in particular. In this book Jaco Gericke is concerned with different ways of approaching the question of what, according to the Yericke Bible, a god was assumed to be.
Jaco Gericke – Google Scholar Citations
In this way, the present study also goes beyond the traditional concern with the nature of God in Old Testament theology. Please try your request again later.
This despite the fact that in their current rhetorical location the format is not as such philosophical anymore. Within biblical scholarship, such research is often characterized by a metalanguage filled with philosophically vague and fuzzy descriptive jargon, largely bereft of technical greicke and nuance. Waar die relevante navorsing tans beperk is tot linguistiese, historiese, komparatiewe en teologiese perspektiewe wat almal poog om dit te antwoordblyk daar skynbaar min belangstelling te wees in wat hoegenaamd bedoel word met n vraag van die vorm ” Wat is X?
One possible reason for this state of affairs may jaoc the fact that Qohelet’s assumptions about the nature of morality have never been studied against the backdrop of issues and theories in contemporary analytic meta-ethics. The scope thereof is said to include anything from sheer terror before the deity to pious respect for benevolence.
As gericoe supplement to the tradition of predominantly linguistic, historical, literary, comparative, social-scientific and related ways of looking at the research problem, Jxco offers a variety of experimental philosophical perspectives that aim to take a step back from the scholarly discussion as it has unfolded hirtheto in order to provide a new type of worry when looking at the riddle of what the biblical texts assumed made a god divine.